'What sort of person is our Cossack? Many-layered: looting, reckless daring, professionalism, revolutionary spirit, bestial cruelty.’
Poland, 30 August 1920: the Russian General Semyon Mikhailovich Budyonny and his dreaded First Cavalry Army, the Konarmiya, are facing disaster. Stuck in a 10-mile cul-de-sac, surrounded by resurgent enemy, and with artillery shells falling in all directions, Budyonny needs to find a quick means of escape. Poor weather compounds the misery, with incessant rain turning the dusty roads into rivers of mud. However, an easterly route leading from the village of Czesniki offers a ray of hope and, although the Poles have forces in the area, Budyonny is confident they lack the strength and cohesion to offer firm resistance. The key to success would be speed and dominating the high ground between Czesniki and a hamlet called Komarów. Hold this and a rapid withdrawal could be made in relatively good order. Budyonny’s Cossacks were ordered to prepare for a breakout the next morning and, in the event, would end up fighting one of Europe’s last grand cavalry battles.
The eagle and the bear
Most of the causes behind the Polish-Russian conflict of 1920 can be traced to the final days of the First World War and its immediate aftermath. The Polish state had been resurrected as Imperial Germany collapsed, the original Kingdom having been finally carved up between Prussia, Russia and Austria in 1795. While Poland’s western borders were comparatively secure, its eastern and south-easterly lines were so poorly defined that conflict with its neighbours was almost guaranteed. Indeed, conflict between Poles and Ukrainians erupted even before the First World War ended, with both sides vying for control of eastern Galicia and the main prize of Lemberg, a city the Poles called Lwów (now Lviv).
The Poles had gained the upper hand by summer 1919, relieving Lwów from a siege that had lasted from November 1918 until May 1919. They also seized other territory, including the important Drohobycz oil fields, and slowly forced the Ukrainians to accept terms at the negotiating table. The animosity between the two had faded somewhat as a growing threat to both nations became increasingly apparent: the Russian Civil War was moving towards a climax. It is beyond the scope of this feature to detail the complex situation within Russia at this stage, although it is worth noting that neither the Bolsheviks nor the Whites* were willing to fully accommodate the national hopes of Ukraine or Poland. Indeed, it was likely that the winner of the Civil War, White or Red, would reassert Russian domination over Ukraine,+ as well as regions that Poland considered integral, such as Lwów and Wilno (now Vilnius).
*Primarily Tsarists and democrats.
+The Russian Empire's traditional breadbasket.
Worse still, if the Bolsheviks won, they might seek to invade all of Poland and recast the country in their own image. Poland’s founding father and national leader, Marshal Pilsidski, wrote after the war: ‘Soviet Russia was conforming to a set plan, namely the plan of setting up in Poland an organisation identical with its own, which is to say, a Soviet one. This objective was christened “Exporting the Revolution”. It was well known to me that this was the war aim of the Soviets … So far as I personally was concerned, I made war with the sole object of warding off from Poland this “Revolution” which was being “exported” at the point of bayonets.’
Pilsudski eventually reached a deal with his Ukrainian counterpart, Symon Petliura, in 1920. With him, Pilsudski sought to liberate Ukraine and then form a united front to contain any aggressive moves by a revanchist Russia. This dovetailed into the Marshal’s nascent political goal dubbed Prometheism, which sought to align Poland alongside other nations asserting independence in the wake of the Tsarist collapse, including Azerbaijan, Estonia, Finland, Georgia and Latvia. In addition, Pilsudski was wary of the Western Allies’ guarantees towards Poland, suspecting they neither appreciated the complexities of the eastern borderlands or assist Poland if she was ever threatened with crisis. This hunch was proved correct at the height of the Bolshevik advance in summer 1920, with Britain remaining apathetic and calling for both side to recognise the Curzon line.* France was slightly more pro-active, sending military advisors and important war materiel to Poland.
Finally, the climate was the most opportune one in which to strike as the Reds and Whites were still tearing chunks out of each other. It was hoped favourable terms could be agreed with the eventual winner of this titanic struggle, with the advantage that Poland would be able to so from a position of greater strength. Thus Pilsudski ordered his forces to attack east, advancing relatively swiftly across march lands known to the Poles as the Kresy. Wilno, Minsk and Dvinsk were all taken by 1920 and, by April, the Poles were pushing deep into Ukraine, taking Kiev on 6 May with the aid of the Independent Ukrainian Army led by Petliura. But now there was a grave problem: the Bolsheviks were pushing back their White opponents on all fronts, including Anton Denikin who was eventually left with a small but notable Crimean enclave. The Red Army was now free to start massing forces to strike west and crush the Poles.
The leviathan stirs
Two Red Army strike groups were prepared: a large northern one and a smaller but rapid southern formation to which the Konarmiya had been assigned. Confidence was high, with many hoping that the march westwards would topple the bourgeois governments of central Europe, starting with Poland and then Germany. In May, commander of the northern strike force, Marshal Mikhail Tukachevsky, proclaimed: ‘Turn your eyes to the West. In the West the fate of World Revolution is being decided. Over the corpse of White Poland lies the road to World Conflagration. On our bayonets we will bring happiness and peace.’ The dreaded Konarmiya would play a central role in bringing forward this joyous future.
Known officially as the First Cavalry Army, the Konarmiya was created in November 1919 under the auspices of Josef Stalin. Initially its role was to combat White cavalry and Tsarist Cossacks. Calling their troops ‘Red Cossacks’ was disingenuous as most of the cavalrymen were hastily-enlisted Russian peasants. Others were from the urban working class, many of whom had never ridden a horse until joining up. There were also some members of the communist intelligentsia, including Isaac Babel, who would become a renowned author,* was assigned to the Konarmiya’s 6th Division during the Polish campaign. Babel tried to capture the essence of the Red Cossack in his diary of the campaign, writing: ‘What sort of person is our Cossack? Many-layered: looting, reckless daring, professionalism, revolutionary spirit, bestial cruelty.’ Mercenary in nature, the thought of booty, pillage and plunder was never far from their minds. On another occasion Babel admitted ‘we are destroyers … we move like a whirlwind, like a stream of lava hated by everyone.’
*At that time he was backed by the famed Russian novelist Maxim Gorky. His subsequent work Red Cavalry was heavily based on his experiences in the Polish war and its candid portrayal of the Konarmiya’s brutality infuriated Budyonny.
The Konarmiya’s political officer Kliment Voroshilov and military commander General Budyonny, a former Tsarist cavalry corporal, led them. It was to Budyonny that the Cossacks owed their allegiance. A tall, powerful man with a handlebar moustache, Budyonny looked like a colour sergeant but behaved more like a swashbuckling pirate. He joined the Bolshevik cause during the revolution of 1917 and, as a natural leader with the right class credentials, shot up the ranks to assume command of the Konarmiya upon its formation. Although often rash and impetuous, Budyonny had electric charisma and even the harshest critics of his performance in 1920 have recognised his enormous personal courage and ability to take decisive actions in the face of great danger.
By the spring of 1920, after a number of successful campaigns against the Whites, the First Cavalry Army had grown to four full divisions of horse, or about 18,000 sabres. They were accompanied by 52 field guns, five armoured trains and a squadron of 15 aircraft, although they were still in the packing cases because no one in the Konarmiya could fly. The horseman’s personal equipment was rather basic, with an American pilot fighting in the famous Kosciuszko Squadron* noting this after seeing them from the air. He wrote: ‘Each man carried an amazingly long sabre hung not from his saddle but his belt line, [while] row after row of carbines hung aslant over their backs.’
*A unit similar in concept to the First World War’s Lafayette Squadron and including a sizable contingent of Americans and Polish-Americans.
The Konarmiya’s tactics were basic and, out in the sweeping vastness of Russia, well suited to swift-moving horsemen. They tried to avoid charging prepared positions, as the machine gun had made such an approach virtually suicidal. Instead, they would look for a weak spot in the enemy’s lines that they would try to punch through by attacking en masse. They would then fan out to create havoc in the enemy's rear lines, normally breaking their opponent’s will to resist and leaving the Konarmiya victorious. Bathing in the glow of its success and elite reputation, many in the Konarmiya saw themselves as a near-invincible force. Events in Poland would shatter these beliefs.
Break on through
Despite several accounts at the time describing Red Army ‘hordes’, the Polish campaign in its starting phase was on a relatively small scale, with 115,000 frontline Bolsheviks opposing around 95,000 Poles. The numbers would mushroom as the conflict progressed and reached a peak in August 1920, with both nations fielding armies over 700,000. However, not all of these men were combat ready and many performed supporting roles or were dedicated to logistics.
The Soviet counter-attack started in mid-May 1920, with the Konarmiya fielded in south-central Ukraine. Budyonny was in command at the sharp end and reported to Yegorov, the nominal commander of the southern strike force. But in practise, it was the chief political commissar for the south and de facto commander-in-chief of the front, Joseph Stalin, who determined immediate strategy. Militarily, all three were meant to be subordinate to the Red Army’s supreme command, which was headed by Sergey Kamenev. The overall plan at this stage was for the Konarmyia to smash through its immediate enemy before striking towards Kiev, where it would help cut off the Polish Third Army and join in with its destruction. Opposing them was a small force of about 3,000 troops led by General Karnicki. Ironically, he had been one of Budyonny’s commanding officers in the Tsarist days.
Hopelessly outnumbered, the Poles made a series of desperate attempts to stall the Konarmiya’s advance and gain time for the Third Army’s withdrawal. Karnicki also authorised a number of swift raids to throw the advancing Russians off balance. Other Polish formations were hunkered down in temporary defences, waiting for the Cossacks to near their positions before unleashing devastating volleys once the enemy was close enough. The tactic required nerves of steel as the Konarmiya was a psychologically-daunting sight. One Polish officer remembered the impact of seeing them for the first time: ‘This swarm of horsemen would raise gigantic dust clouds on the horizon, blotting out everything for miles around, and giving the impression of a great, fast-moving and fantastic force pouring into every free gap. Finally, it would kindle a feeling of utter impotence.’
But Budyonny was worried about the impact Polish resistance was having on the morale of his troops who were used to barnstorming advances. He was also keen to achieve a quick and decisive breakthrough and so personally led an assault on the enemy’s positions. The dangers were considerable as the attack was made across boggy and treacherous ground, yet the gamble paid off. Physically exhausted and faced with a concerted attack, the Polish lines crumpled.
Flushed with victory, the Konarmiya’s commanders now made their first major mistake. On June 6, instead of ordering the First Cavalry Army to swing north, they decided it should press on towards the easier pickings of Zhitomir and Berdychiv. Frustrated by the earlier lack of success, the Red Cossacks vented their fury on the local population and torched the local hospital in Berdychiv, with more than 600 patients and nurses murdered. Stalin and Yegorov let the First Cavalry Army continue its rampage until June 8, affording Polish forces in Kiev a crucial 48 hours to withdraw in relative order and without the threat of encirclement. The outcome would have been disastrous for the Poles if the Konarmiya had followed its orders and helped block their enemy's exit routes.
Despite this notable failure, the Red Army’s drive through Ukraine gathered momentum, pushing back any opposition encountered, and it was poised to strike into Poland by mid-July. The Konarmiya, still to the south of the main strike force, had kept pace. A few weeks earlier, on 2 July, it had crossed the River Horyn and seized the town of Równe (now Rivne), capturing prisoners, supplies and equipment. Communist propaganda responded to the successes by trumpeting the dawn of global revolution, with one pamphlet confidently declaring: ‘We shall fight on endlessly. Russia has thrown down the gauntlet. We shall advance into Europe and conquer the world.’ But Marxist dreams were the last thing on the average Cossack’s mind. Time and again in his diary, Babel bemoans their lack of idealism: ‘This isn’t a Marxist revolution,’ he wrote, ‘it’s a Cossack rebellion, out to win all and lose nothing.’ On another occasion he gave a more candid appraisal: ‘Our army is out to line its pockets.’
With the advance moving so swiftly, few in Russian high command paid much attention to unravelling communications between the northern and southern strike forces. This was primarily due to distance, an inflexible command structure and a clash of personalities. Dispatches, rather than going directly to the leaders in the field, went first through the hands of the supreme commander, Kamenev, and thence from him back down the chain of corresponding leaders. Information, intelligence and orders crucial to joint planning were frequently out-of-date by the time they were received. It was a recipe for disaster.
Scourge of Galicia
Under a rather hastily-formed plan, the Konarmiya was now ordered to sweep southwest before heading northwest to re-link with Tukachevsky’s forces, which were forging ahead on an east-to-west axis directly aimed at Warsaw. But Stalin, Yegorov and Budyonny started to have other ideas once more; this time their eyes were straying much further southwest than high command intended, with the triumvirate considering an effort to conquer the Poles in Galicia and seize Lwów.
Historians and commentators have hotly debated their reasoning. Was it simply an insatiable effort to grab military glory? Perhaps so, although one must also consider the political climate of the time, which was steeped in Machiavellian intrigue and strong-armed jostling. From Stalin’s perspective, the Polish edifice was crumbling at a rapid pace and it was only a matter of time before Tukachevsky stole the limelight with the inevitable capture of Warsaw. Worse, Tukachevsky was affiliated with Stalin’s bête noire, Leon Trotsky, Lenin’s heir-apparent and the Red Army’s supreme commander-in-chief. It was Trotsky who had given Tukachevsky command of the 5th Army in Siberia the year before, setting him on the path to ascendancy that culminated in the Polish campaign.
With the support of Yegorov and Budyonny, Stalin was determined that the Konarmiya should seize whatever prizes it could and do so with haste. While not on the scale of capturing Warsaw, taking Lwów and possibly Krakow (Poland’s spiritual heart) would still rank as prestigious victories. Few people would bother arguing about disobeyed orders once the dust had settled and the laurels were being handed out. The worst outcome was for the Konarmyia and its commanders to be considered little more than Tukachevsky’s supporting arm.
Stalin unleashed the First Cavalry Army in late July. It sallied forth from Równe at a rapid pace, pushing well beyond the supply lines. The Cossacks were forced to pillage or, in the party language, ‘expropriate’ rations from villages and market towns. Pilsudski considered Budyonny’s enterprise as akin to a modern-day Tartar horde. ‘Cavalry covering great distances almost without organising its rear; men and horses living off the country like locusts… such cavalry, I say, constituted as an independent army [seemed] then, and still seems to me to be, strategically speaking, a nonsensical conception.’ Nonetheless, Pilsudski recognised the Konarmiya’s fearsome reputation was starting to erode Polish morale. ‘Budienny’s* cavalry became a legendary invincible force in the eyes of our troops, which lacked the necessary preparation to deal with it. The further one went from the front, the more powerful and irresistible was the effect of this unreasoning fear.’
*The Polish spelling of their opponent’s name.
But even with its formidable reputation, the Konarmiya stumbled into trouble by creating a deep and narrow salient near the town of Brody that the Poles endeavoured to close, hoping to crush their enemy. Realising the threat, Budyonny desperately sought to extricate his forces and, along with Voroshilov, his brilliant leadership carried the day. The Polish historian Zamoyski wrote: ‘He and Voroshilov hardly slept at all during those days; they were always to be found at any point where morale was beginning to flag, Voroshilov exhorting, Budyonny leading charges.’ The Red Cossacks escaped by the skin of their teeth and Budyonny later admitted that the affair took his men to ‘the outer limits of human resources’.
Events soon returned to the Konarmiya’s favour when Pilsudski started to denude the southern theatre of men in order to bolster Warsaw’s defences and, unbeknown to the Russians, made preparations for a bold counterstroke that would flow from the Polish centre into and around Tukachevsky’s exposed left flank. Pilsudski’s opposite, Kamenev, had already identified this as a potential danger, although underestimated its eventual scale. He was also concerned that the Konarmiya seemed to be drifting away from the northern forces; it was important that the First Cavalry Army now assist Tukachevsky and cover his left flank. Erring on the side of caution, Kamenev ordered the Konarmyia to proceed to Lublin and await Tukachevsky’s direct command.
Stalin, Yegorov and Budyonny responded by disregarding these orders and making preparations for an onslaught southwest towards Lwów. Increasingly frustrated, Kamenev issued another directive on 12 August, again he instructed Stalin and Yegorov to place the Konarmiya under Tukachevsky’s control. The pair sat on the order almost to the point of dereliction before forwarding it to Budyonny on 15 August – long after the drive towards Lwów had started. Budyonny’s response was cruder than Stalin and Yegorov’s: he simply disregarded Kamenev’s instructions, arguing that the orders failed to mention any specific locations, a technicality that allowed him to request further ‘clarification’. In the meantime, the advance on Lwów continued.
Endnote: The Curzon Line was delineated in 1919 by the Supreme Council’s commission for Polish affairs. The Supreme Council was responsible for voicing the will of the Allied victors in the aftermath of the First World War. The line became forever associated with British foreign secretary Lord Curzon after he suggested using it as a ceasefire boundary in his telegram to Lenin’s government in July 1920. The population west of the line was majority Polish, while the territory to the east was mixed, becoming increasingly Ukrainian in the southeast and central east, and Belorussian and Lithuanian in the northeast. However, many of the eastern cities were majority Polish, including Wilno, Pilsudski’s native home. Both sides ignored the Curzon Line when their forces were in the ascendant but were more willing to support it when their forces were on the back foot. The line had second lease of life when used as the Soviet Union’s guiding principles in redrawing Poland’s post-war borders in the east.
© 2016 Simon Rees. All rights reserved